United States · ADA · Guidance
Guidance on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
The Department of Justice’s explanation of changes to the ADA design standards, with section-by-section analysis and responses to public comments.
- Publisher
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Edition
- September 2010 guidance
- Search coverage
- 168 of 170 PDF pages · 4 OCR pages
AccessibilityAnthropometry & ergonomics
Open original PDF at page 10 Source wording and page order preserved. Drawings and table layouts remain available in the original PDF.
Section 35.151 -- Title II Regulation
Sec. 35.151(b)(2) stated that the path of The Department is not changing the
travel requirements of Sec. 35.151(b)(4) shall requirements for program accessibility. As
not apply to measures taken solely to comply provided in Sec. 35.151(b)(2) of the regula-
with program accessibility requirements. tion, the path of travel requirements of Sec.
35.151(b)(4) only apply to alterations under-
Where the specific requirements for path taken solely for purposes other than to meet
of travel apply under title III, they are lim- the program accessibility requirements.
ited to the extent that the cost and scope The exemption for the specific path of travel
of alterations to the path of travel are dis- requirement was included in the regula-
proportionate to the cost of the overall tion to ensure that the specific requirements
alteration, as determined under criteria and disproportionality exceptions for path of
established by the Attorney General. travel are not applied when areas are being
altered to meet the title II program accessibil-
The Access Board included the path of ity requirements in Sec. 35.150. In contrast,
travel requirement for alterations to facilities when areas are being altered to meet pro-
covered by the standards (other than those gram accessibility requirements, they must
subject to the residential facilities standards) comply with all of the applicable require-
in section 202.4 of 2004 ADAAG. Section ments referenced in section 202 of the 2010
35.151(b)(4)(iii) of the final rule establishes Standards. A covered title II entity must pro-
the criteria for determining when the cost of vide accessibility to meet the requirements
alterations to the path of travel is “dispropor- of Sec. 35.150 unless doing so is an undue
tionate’’ to the cost of the overall alteration. financial and administrative burden in accor-
dance with Sec. 35.150(a)(3). A covered title
The NPRM also provided that areas II entity may not use the disproportionality
such as supply storage rooms, employee exception contained in the path of travel pro-
lounges and locker rooms, janitorial closets, visions as a defense to providing an acces-
entrances, and corridors are not areas con- sible route as part of its obligation to provide
taining a primary function. Nor are restroom program accessibility. The undue financial
areas considered to contain a primary func- and administrative burden standard does
tion unless the provision of restrooms is a not contain any bright line financial tests.
primary purpose of the facility, such as at a
highway rest stop. In that situation, a rest- The Department’s proposed
room would be considered to be an “area Sec. 35.151(b)(4) adopted the language
containing a primary function’’ of the facility. now contained in Sec. 36.403 of the title
III regulation, including the disproportion-
ality limitation (i.e., alterations made to
6 - Guidance on 2010 Standards: Title II Department of Justice
Edition and local adoption determine which requirements apply. Use the publisher’s document for the complete clauses, diagrams and amendments.