United States · ADA · Guidance
Guidance on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
The Department of Justice’s explanation of changes to the ADA design standards, with section-by-section analysis and responses to public comments.
- Publisher
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Edition
- September 2010 guidance
- Search coverage
- 168 of 170 PDF pages · 4 OCR pages
AccessibilityAnthropometry & ergonomics
Open original PDF at page 41 Source wording and page order preserved. Drawings and table layouts remain available in the original PDF.
Section 35.151 -- Title II Regulation
but not requiring, this type of dispersal, the (1) and (k)(2) of the final rule require acces-
Access Board stated that “[m]any detention sible cells in each classification area.
and correctional facilities are designed so
that certain areas (e.g., `shift’ areas) can be Medical facilities. The NPRM also did not
adapted to serve as different types of housing propose language addressing the application
according to need’’ and that “[p]lacement of the 2004 ADAAG to medical and long-term
of accessible cells or rooms in shift areas care facilities in correctional and detention
may allow additional flexibility in meeting facilities. The provisions of the 2004 ADAAG
requirements for dispersion of accessible contain requirements for licensed medical
cells or rooms.’’ and long-term care facilities, but not those
that are unlicensed. A disability advocacy
The Department notes that inmates are group and a number of other commenters
typically housed in separate areas of deten- recommended that the Department expand
tion and correctional facilities based on a the application of section 232.4 to apply to all
number of factors, including their classifica- such facilities in detention and correctional
tion level. In many instances, detention and facilities, regardless of licensure. They
correctional facilities have housed inmates recommended that whenever a correctional
in inaccessible cells, even though acces- facility has a program that is addressed
sible cells were available elsewhere in the specifically in the 2004 ADAAG, such as
facility, because there were no cells in the a long-term care facility, the 2004 ADAAG
areas where they needed to be housed, such scoping and design features should apply
as in administrative or disciplinary segrega- for those elements. Similarly, a building
tion, the women’s section of the facility, or code organization noted that its percentage
in a particular security classification area. requirements for accessible units is based on
what occurs in the space, not on the building
The Department received a number of type.
comments stating that dispersal of acces-
sible cells together with an adequate number The Department is persuaded by these
of accessible cells is necessary to prevent comments and has added Sec. 35.151(k)
inmates with disabilities from placement in (3), which states that “[w]ith respect to
improper security classification and to ensure medical and long-term care facilities in jails,
integration. Commenters recommended prisons, and other detention and correc-
modification of the scoping requirements tional facilities, public entities shall apply
to require a percentage of accessible cells the 2010 Standards technical and scoping
in each program, classification, use or ser- requirements for those facilities irrespective
vice area. The Department is persuaded by of whether those facilities are licensed.’’
these comments. Accordingly, Sec. 35.151(k)
Department of Justice Guidance on 2010 Standards: Title II - 37
Edition and local adoption determine which requirements apply. Use the publisher’s document for the complete clauses, diagrams and amendments.