United States · ADA · Guidance
Guidance on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
The Department of Justice’s explanation of changes to the ADA design standards, with section-by-section analysis and responses to public comments.
- Publisher
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Edition
- September 2010 guidance
- Search coverage
- 168 of 170 PDF pages · 4 OCR pages
AccessibilityAnthropometry & ergonomics
Open original PDF at page 47 Source wording and page order preserved. Drawings and table layouts remain available in the original PDF.
Subpart D - Title III Regulation
ADA Standards for Accessible Design) deleting the advisory information now
provides a description of the major changes published in a table at Sec. 36.406(b).
in the 2010 Standards (as compared to Compliance date. When the ADA was
the 1991 ADAAG) and a discussion of enacted, the compliance dates for various
the public comments that the Department provisions were delayed in order to provide
received on specific sections of the 2004 time for covered entities to become familiar
ADAAG. A number of commenters asked with their new obligations. Titles II and III
the Department to revise certain provi- of the ADA generally became effective on
sions in the 2004 ADAAG in a manner that January 26, 1992, six months after the
would reduce either the required scoping or regulations were published. See 42 U.S.C.
specific technical accessibility requirements. 12131 note; 42 U.S.C. 12181 note. New
As previously stated, the ADA requires the construction under title II and alterations
Department to adopt standards consistent under either title II or title III had to comply
with the guidelines adopted by the Access with the design standards on that date. See
Board. The Department will not adopt any 42 U.S.C. 12131 note; 42 U.S.C. 12183(a)
standards that provide less accessibil- (2). For new construction under title III, the
ity than is provided under the guidelines requirements applied to facilities designed
contained in the 2004 ADAAG because the and constructed for first occupancy after
guidelines adopted by the Access Board are January 26, 1993--18 months after the
“ minimum guidelines.’’ 42 U.S.C. 12186(c). 1991 Standards were published by the
Department. See 42 U.S.C. 12183(a)(1).
In the NPRM, the Department specifi-
cally proposed amending Sec. 36.406(a) by The Department received numerous
dividing it into two sections. Proposed Sec. comments on the issue of effective date,
36.406(a)(1) specified that new construc- many of them similar to those received
tion and alterations subject to this part shall in response to the ANPRM. A substantial
comply with the 1991 Standards if physical number of commenters advocated a mini-
construction of the property commences mum of 18 months from publication of the
less than six months after the effective final rule to the effective date for applica-
date of the rule. Proposed Sec. 36.406(a) tion of the standards to new construction,
(2) specified that new construction and consistent with the time period used for
alterations subject to this part shall comply implementation of the 1991 Standards.
with the proposed standards if physical Many of these commenters argued that the
construction of the property commences 18-month period was necessary to minimize
six months or more after the effective date the likelihood of having to redesign projects
of the rule. The Department also proposed already in the design and permitting stages
Department of Justice Guidance on 2010 Standards: Title III - 43
Edition and local adoption determine which requirements apply. Use the publisher’s document for the complete clauses, diagrams and amendments.