United States · ADA · Guidance
Guidance on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
The Department of Justice’s explanation of changes to the ADA design standards, with section-by-section analysis and responses to public comments.
- Publisher
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Edition
- September 2010 guidance
- Search coverage
- 168 of 170 PDF pages · 4 OCR pages
AccessibilityAnthropometry & ergonomics
Open original PDF at page 70 Source wording and page order preserved. Drawings and table layouts remain available in the original PDF.
Subpart D - Title III Regulation
applies to new construction and alterations, theaters with 300 or fewer seats; stadium-
these commenters were concerned that the style theaters of all sizes must comply with
rule could be interpreted to apply retroac- this rule. So, for example, stadium-style
tively because of the Department’s state- theaters that must vertically disperse wheel-
ments in the NPRM and ANPRM that this chair spaces and companion seats must
bright line rule, although newly articulated, do so within the parameters of this rule.
is not a new standard but “merely codifi[es]
longstanding Department requirement[s],’’ The NPRM included a provision that
73 FR 34508, 34534 (June 17, 2008), and required assembly areas with more
does not represent a “substantive change than 5,000 seats to provide at least five
from the existing line-of-sight requirements’’ wheelchair spaces with at least three
of section 4.33.3 of the 1991 Standards, companion seats for each of those five
69 FR 58768, 58776 (Sept. 30, 2004). wheelchair spaces. The Department
agrees with commenters who asserted
Although the Department intends for that group seating is better addressed
Sec. 36.406(f)(4) of this rule to apply through ticketing policies rather than
prospectively to new construction and design and has deleted that provision
alterations, this rule is not a departure from this section of the final rule.
from, and is consistent with, the line-of-
sight requirements in the 1991 Standards. Section 36.406(g)
The Department has always interpreted Medical Care Facilities
the line-of-sight requirements in the 1991
Standards to require viewing angles In the 1991 title III regulation, there was
provided to patrons who use wheelchairs no provision addressing the dispersion
to be comparable to those afforded to other of accessible sleeping rooms in medical
spectators. Section 36.406(f)(4) merely care facilities. The Department is aware,
represents the application of these require- however, of problems that individuals with
ments to stadium-style movie theaters. disabilities face in receiving full and equal
medical care when accessible sleeping
One commenter from a trade association rooms are not adequately dispersed. When
sought clarification whether Sec. 36.406(f) accessible rooms are not fully dispersed,
(4) applies to stadium-style theaters with a person with a disability is often placed in
more than 300 seats, and argued that it an accessible room in an area that is not
should not since dispersion requirements medically appropriate for his or her condi-
apply in those theaters. The Department tion, and is thus denied quick access to
declines to limit this rule to stadium-style staff with expertise in that medical specialty
66 - Guidance on 2010 Standards: Title III Department of Justice
Edition and local adoption determine which requirements apply. Use the publisher’s document for the complete clauses, diagrams and amendments.