United States · ADA · Guidance
Guidance on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
The Department of Justice’s explanation of changes to the ADA design standards, with section-by-section analysis and responses to public comments.
- Publisher
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Edition
- September 2010 guidance
- Search coverage
- 168 of 170 PDF pages · 4 OCR pages
AccessibilityAnthropometry & ergonomics
Open original PDF at page 76 Source wording and page order preserved. Drawings and table layouts remain available in the original PDF.
Analysis and Commenta ry o n the 2010 ADAStandards
Section-by-Section Analysis with Public Comments
Application and Administration
properly rests with the covered entity. The
purpose of allowing for equivalent facilitation
102 Dimensions for Adults and Children is to encourage flexibility and innovation
while still ensuring access. The Department
Section 2.1 of the 1991 Standards stated believes that establishing potentially
that the specifications were based upon adult cumbersome bureaucratic provisions for
dimensions and anthropometrics. reviewing requests for equivalent facilitation
The 1991 Standards did not provide specific is inappropriate.
requirements for children’s elements or
facilities. 104 Conventions
Section 102 of the 2010 Standards states Dimensions. Section 104.1 of the 2010
that the technical requirements are based Standards notes that dimensions not stated
on adult dimensions and anthropometrics. as a “maximum” or “minimum” are absolute.
In addition, technical requirements are also Section 104.1.1 of the 2010 Standards
provided based on children’s dimensions and provides that all dimensions are subject to
anthropometrics for drinking fountains, water conventional industry tolerances except
closets and other elements located in toilet where the requirement is stated as a range
compartments, lavatories and sinks, dining with specific minimum and maximum
surfaces, and work surfaces. end points. A commenter stated that the
2010 Standards restrict the application of
103 Equivalent Facilitation construction tolerances only to those few
requirements that are expressed as an
This section acknowledges that nothing absolute dimension.
in these requirements prevents the use
of designs, products, or technologies as This is an incorrect interpretation of sections
alternatives to those prescribed, provided 104.1 and 104.1.1 of the 2010 Standards.
that the alternatives result in substantially Construction and manufacturing tolerances
equivalent or greater accessibility and apply to absolute dimensions as well as to
usability. dimensions expressed as a maximum or
minimum. When the requirement states a
A commenter encouraged the Department specified range, such as in section 609.4
to include a procedure for determining where grab bars must be installed between
equivalent facilitation. The Department 33 inches and 36 inches above the finished
believes that the responsibility for determining floor, that range provides an adequate
and demonstrating equivalent facilitation
72 - Guidance on the 2010 Standards: Titles II and III Department of Justice
Edition and local adoption determine which requirements apply. Use the publisher’s document for the complete clauses, diagrams and amendments.