United States · ADA · Guidance
Guidance on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
The Department of Justice’s explanation of changes to the ADA design standards, with section-by-section analysis and responses to public comments.
- Publisher
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Edition
- September 2010 guidance
- Search coverage
- 168 of 170 PDF pages · 4 OCR pages
AccessibilityAnthropometry & ergonomics
Open original PDF at page 16 Source wording and page order preserved. Drawings and table layouts remain available in the original PDF.
Section 35.151 -- Title II Regulation
Commentary on the 2010 ADA Standards for 42 U.S.C. 12183(a)(1). For new construction
Accessible Design) (which will be published under title III, the requirements applied
today elsewhere in this volume and codified to facilities designed and constructed for
as Appendix B to 28 CFR part 36) provides a first occupancy after January 26, 1993--
description of the major changes in the 2010 18 months after the 1991 Standards were
Standards (as compared to the 1991 ADAAG) published by the Department. In the NPRM,
and a discussion of the public comments that the Department proposed to amend
the Department received on specific sections Sec. 35.151(c)(1) by revising the current
of the 2004 ADAAG. A number of comment- language to limit the application of the 1991
ers asked the Department to revise certain standards to facilities on which construction
provisions in the 2004 ADAAG in a manner commences within six months of the final
that would reduce either the required scop- rule adopting revised standards. The NPRM
ing or specific technical accessibility require- also proposed adding paragraph (c)(2) to
ments. As previously stated, although the Sec. 35.151, which states that facilities on
ADA requires the enforceable standards which construction commences on or after
issued by the Department under title II and the date six months following the effective
title III to be consistent with the minimum date of the final rule shall comply with the
guidelines published by the Access Board, proposed standards adopted by that rule.
it is the sole responsibility of the Attorney
General to promulgate standards and to As a result, under the NPRM, for the first
interpret and enforce those standards. The six months after the effective date, public
guidelines adopted by the Access Board are entities would have the option to use either
“minimum guidelines.’’ 42 U.S.C. 12186(c). UFAS or the 1991 Standards and be in
compliance with title II. Six months after the
Compliance date. When the ADA was effective date of the rule, the new standards
enacted, the effective dates for various would take effect. At that time, construction
provisions were delayed in order to provide in accordance with UFAS would no longer
time for covered entities to become familiar satisfy ADA requirements. The Department
with their new obligations. Titles II and III stated that in order to avoid placing the bur-
of the ADA generally became effective on den of complying with both standards on
January 26, 1992, six months after the public entities, the Department would coor-
regulations were published. See 42 U.S.C. dinate a government-wide effort to revise
12131 note; 42 U.S.C. 12181 note. New Federal agencies’ section 504 regulations
construction under title II and alterations to adopt the 2004 ADAAG as the standard
under either title II or title III had to comply for new construction and alterations.
with the design standards on that date. See
12 - Guidance on 2010 Standards: Title II Department of Justice
Edition and local adoption determine which requirements apply. Use the publisher’s document for the complete clauses, diagrams and amendments.