United States · ADA · Guidance
Guidance on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
The Department of Justice’s explanation of changes to the ADA design standards, with section-by-section analysis and responses to public comments.
- Publisher
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Edition
- September 2010 guidance
- Search coverage
- 168 of 170 PDF pages · 4 OCR pages
AccessibilityAnthropometry & ergonomics
Open original PDF at page 36 Source wording and page order preserved. Drawings and table layouts remain available in the original PDF.
Section 35.151 -- Title II Regulation
Section 35.151(k) The Department believes that the insuf-
Detention and correctional facilities ficient number of accessible cells is, in part,
due to the fact that most jails and prisons
The 1991 Standards did not contain spe- were built long before the ADA became law
cific accessibility standards applicable to and, since then, have undergone few altera-
cells in correctional facilities. However, cor- tions that would trigger the obligation to pro-
rectional and detention facilities operated by vide accessible features in accordance with
or on behalf of public entities have always UFAS or the 1991 Standards. In addition,
been subject to the nondiscrimination and the Department has found that even some
program accessibility requirements of title new correctional facilities lack accessible
II of the ADA. The 2004 ADAAG estab- features. The Department believes that the
lished specific requirements for the design unmet demand for accessible cells is also
and construction and alterations of cells due to the changing demographics of the
in correctional facilities for the first time. inmate population. With thousands of prison-
ers serving life sentences without eligibility for
Based on complaints received by the parole, prisoners are aging, and the prison
Department, investigations, and compliance population of individuals with disabilities and
reviews of jails, prisons, and other detention elderly individuals is growing. A Bureau of
and correctional facilities, the Department Justice Statistics study of State and Federal
has determined that many detention and cor- sentenced inmates (those sentenced to more
rectional facilities do not have enough acces- than one year) shows the total estimated
sible cells, toilets, and shower facilities to count of State and Federal prisoners aged
meet the needs of their inmates with mobility 55 and older grew by 36,000 inmates from
disabilities and some do not have any at all. 2000 (44,200) to 2006 (80,200). William
Inmates are sometimes housed in medical J. Sabol et al., Prisoners in 2006, Bureau
units or infirmaries separate from the gen- of Justice Statistics Bulletin, Dec. 2007, at
eral population simply because there are no 23 (app. table 7), available at http://bjs.ojp.
accessible cells. In addition, some inmates usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=908
have alleged that they are housed at a more (last visited July 16, 2008); Allen J. Beck
restrictive classification level simply because et al., Prisoners in 2000, Bureau of Justice
no accessible housing exists at the appropri- Statistics Bulletin, Aug. 2001, at 10 (Aug.
ate classification level. The Department’s 2001) (Table 14), available at bjs.ojp.usdoj.
compliance reviews and investigations have gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=927 (last
substantiated certain of these allegations. visited July 16, 2008). This jump consti-
tutes an increase of 81 percent in prison-
ers aged 55 and older during this period.
32 - Guidance on 2010 Standards: Title II Department of Justice
Edition and local adoption determine which requirements apply. Use the publisher’s document for the complete clauses, diagrams and amendments.